For decades, going public via an IPO was seen as the pinnacle of success for high-growth companies. But now, firms like SpaceX, OpenAI, and Stripe are choosing to stay private sometimes indefinitely.
The IPO landscape has undergone a dramatic shift. Since the mid-1990s, the number of publicly listed U.S. companies has fallen by nearly half, and IPO activity has slowed sharply. In 2024, only 150 companies valued at $50 million or more went public down from 397 in 2021, a year that saw blockbuster debuts like Rivian (RIVN) and Coinbase (COIN).
As IPOs slow down, the private market is surging. The State Street Private Equity Index now represents over $5.7 trillion in value a staggering increase from its $1.1 trillion in committed capital when it launched in 2007. That’s more than a 5x expansion, underscoring how private equity has become a dominant funding source for high-growth companies.
A growing wave of billion-dollar companies is choosing to stay private eschewing the traditional IPO route in favor of deep-pocketed private equity and venture capital firms. This shift reflects a broader transformation in how high-growth firms fund expansion and manage investor relations.
These companies have vast reach, massive revenues, and global influence but no plans to go public. For retail investors, this means fewer chances to invest early in transformative technologies and platforms.
In the United States, privately held companies are required to go public if they meet both of the following conditions:
These thresholds are enforced by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to ensure transparency and investor protection once a company reaches a certain size and public exposure.
Many large private firms like SpaceX and Stripe strategically manage their shareholder structure to avoid triggering these limits, allowing them to stay private longer while still raising billions in capital.
The decision by billion-dollar startups to stay private isn’t just a corporate strategy it’s reshaping how individual investors access growth.
As John Blank notes, private equity has traditionally been reserved for institutional and high-net-worth investors. While ETFs attempt to mimic private market exposure, they often fall short of capturing the true upside of early-stage growth.
Even if IPO activity resumes, Blank warns that this cycle is structurally different:
Staying private benefits founders and early investors, who retain control and access to exclusive funding rounds. But it limits retail investors’ ability to buy in early often missing out on the most explosive growth phases.
With fewer companies going public, traditional avenues for accessing innovation are narrowing. This makes it harder for everyday investors to participate in the next generation of market leaders.
Private equity ETFs and pre-IPO platforms may offer exposure but they come with complexity, limited transparency, and varying risk profiles. Always check what’s inside the wrapper before chasing returns.
In this new normal, diversification isn’t just about spreading risk it’s about adapting to structural shifts in how companies raise capital and who gets access.